Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10100.
Advantages of Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 18% better in Battlefield V than Core i3-10100 - 283 vs 239 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10100 - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i3-10100
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - $91.99 vs $269.79
- Up to 60% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i7-13700F - $0.38 vs $0.95 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
283
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.95/FPS
40%
Price, $
$269.79
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for $269.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
239
84%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$91.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $91.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-13700F | vs | Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |