In Rust, the Core i7-13700F is quite a bit faster than the Celeron 847. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-13700F
- Up to 29% faster in Rust – 269 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 29% faster in Rust
- Is 11 years and 6 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Jun 19, 2011
- Is 11 years and 6 months newer
Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 74% less energy – 17 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 74% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i7-13700F vs Celeron 847: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-13700F vs Celeron 847 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-13700F vs Celeron 847 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-13700F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Celeron 847
Jun 19th, 2011
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
2 MB
7%
Base Frequency
1.1 GHz
52%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-13700F Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron 847 Jun 19th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jun 19th, 2011 |
| $359.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | Intel BGA 1023 |
| 65W | Power Consumption | 17W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
