In Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, the Core i7-1280P is slightly slower than the Core i7-14700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-1280P
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 28 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 57% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-14700F
- Up to 11% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 – 128 vs 115 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
- Is 1 year and 10 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Feb 23, 2022
- Is 1 year and 10 months newer
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 FPS Calculator
Core i7-1280P vs Core i7-14700F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
128 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
96 FPS
100%
Price, $
$302.97
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.36/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-1280P vs Core i7-14700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-1280P vs Core i7-14700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-1280P
Feb 23rd, 2022
Cores
14-core
70%
L3 Cache
24 MB
73%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
89%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
86%
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
33 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-1280P Feb 23rd, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-14700F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 23rd, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $359.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1744 | Socket | LGA1700 |
28W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
Iris Xe 96EU | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
