In Starfield, the Core i7-12700K is slightly faster than the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-12700K
- Up to 5% faster in Starfield – 97 vs 92 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Starfield
- Is 4 years and 2 months newer – Nov 04, 2021 vs Aug 10, 2017
- Is 4 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 125 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
No clear advantages
Starfield FPS Calculator
Core i7-12700K vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Aug 10th, 2017
Average FPS
92 FPS
95%
Min 1% FPS
54 FPS
84%
Price, $
$850
100%
Value, $/FPS
$9.23/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-12700K vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-12700K vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-12700K
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
12-core
75%
L3 Cache
25 MB
78%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Aug 10th, 2017
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
80%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
56%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-12700K Nov 4th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 1950X Aug 10th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
$409.00 | MSRP | $999.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | SP3r2 |
125W | Power Consumption | 180W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
