In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i7-12700F is slightly slower than the Ryzen 5 1600 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $145 more expensive!
Core i7-12700F
- Is 4 years and 8 months newer – Jan 04, 2022 vs Apr 11, 2017
- Is 4 years and 8 months newer
Ryzen 5 1600
- Up to 6% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 179 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 59% cheaper – $99.99 vs $244.99
- Up to 59% cheaper
- Up to 62% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.55 vs $1.44/FPS
- Up to 62% better value in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i7-12700F vs Ryzen 5 1600: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-12700F
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
169 FPS
94%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
95%
Price, $
$244.99
40%
Value, $/FPS
$1.44/FPS
38%
Ryzen 5 1600
Apr 11th, 2017
Average FPS
179 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
134 FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-12700F vs Ryzen 5 1600 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-12700F vs Ryzen 5 1600 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-12700F
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
66%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Ryzen 5 1600
Apr 11th, 2017
Cores
6-core
50%
L3 Cache
16 MB
64%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
73%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
56%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-12700F Jan 4th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 1600 Apr 11th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2022 | Released | Apr 11th, 2017 |
| $324.00 | MSRP | $219.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | AM4 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
