Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700F is 614 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400.
Advantages of Core i7-12700F
- Performs up to 26% better in Dirt 5 than Core i5-10400 - 229 vs 182 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400 - 20 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Core i5-10400
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i7-12700F - $124.95 vs $235.99
- Up to 33% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i7-12700F - $0.69 vs $1.03 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-12700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
229
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.03/FPS
67%
Price, $
$235.99
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for $235.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 417 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
182
79%
Value, $/FPS
$0.69/FPS
100%
Price, $
$124.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $124.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 417 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-12700F | vs | Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |