In Atomfall, the Core i7-12700 is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 9 285. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $244 cheaper!
Core i7-12700
- Up to 43% cheaper – $318.99 vs $563.41
- Up to 43% cheaper
- Up to 40% better value in Atomfall – $1.36 vs $2.27/FPS
- Up to 40% better value in Atomfall
Core Ultra 9 285
- Up to 6% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 234 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Atomfall
- Is 3 years newer – Jan 14, 2025 vs Jan 14, 2022
- Is 3 years newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-12700 vs Core Ultra 9 285: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-12700
Jan 14th, 2022
Average FPS
234 FPS
94%
Min 1% FPS
175 FPS
94%
Price, $
$318.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.36/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 14th, 2025
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$563.41
56%
Value, $/FPS
$2.27/FPS
60%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-12700 vs Core Ultra 9 285 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-12700 vs Core Ultra 9 285 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-12700
Jan 14th, 2022
Cores
12-core
50%
L3 Cache
25 MB
69%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
88%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
75%
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 14th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-12700 Jan 14th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 285 Jan 14th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 14th, 2022 | Released | Jan 14th, 2025 |
$349.00 | MSRP | $579.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
