In Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, the Core i7-11800H is slightly faster than the Core i5-10400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-11800H
- Up to 8% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 – 111 vs 103 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
- Is 1 year and 10 days newer – May 11, 2021 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 1 year and 10 days newer
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-10400F
No clear advantages
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 FPS Calculator
Core i7-11800H vs Core i5-10400F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
103 FPS
93%
Min 1% FPS
76 FPS
92%
Price, $
$139.55
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.35/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-11800H vs Core i5-10400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-11800H vs Core i5-10400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-11800H
May 11th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.9 GHz
66%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
12 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
93%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
83%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-11800H May 11th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-10400F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 11th, 2021 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $395.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1787 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
