In Atomfall, the Core i7-11700KF is faster than the Celeron G1620. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-11700KF
- Up to 24% faster in Atomfall – 230 vs 185 FPS
- Up to 24% faster in Atomfall
- Is 8 years and 3 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Dec 03, 2012
- Is 8 years and 3 months newer
Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 55 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 56% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-11700KF vs Celeron G1620: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-11700KF
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
230 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
172 FPS
100%
Price, $
$299
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.3/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-11700KF vs Celeron G1620 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-11700KF vs Celeron G1620 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-11700KF
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Celeron G1620
Dec 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
12%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
75%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-11700KF Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron G1620 Dec 3rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| $374.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1155 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 55 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel HD |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
