In Rust, the Core i7-11700F is faster than the FX-8320. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $148 more expensive!
Core i7-11700F
- Up to 18% faster in Rust – 247 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 18% faster in Rust
- Is 8 years and 4 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 8 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
FX-8320
- Up to 63% cheaper – $88.10 vs $235.99
- Up to 63% cheaper
- Up to 56% better value in Rust – $0.42 vs $0.95/FPS
- Up to 56% better value in Rust
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i7-11700F vs FX-8320: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-11700F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
247 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
69 FPS
100%
Price, $
$235.99
37%
Value, $/FPS
$0.95/FPS
44%
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
209 FPS
85%
Min 1% FPS
42 FPS
61%
Price, $
$88.1
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-11700F vs FX-8320 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-11700F vs FX-8320 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-11700F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
82%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-11700F Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-8320 Oct 23rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| $298.00 | MSRP | $169.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | AM3+ |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
