In Atomfall, the Core i7-11700F is faster than the Core i5-3450S. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $151 more expensive!
Core i7-11700F
- Up to 18% faster in Atomfall – 226 vs 192 FPS
- Up to 18% faster in Atomfall
- Is 8 years and 10 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Apr 29, 2012
- Is 8 years and 10 months newer
Core i5-3450S
- Up to 64% cheaper – $85.00 vs $235.99
- Up to 64% cheaper
- Up to 58% better value in Atomfall – $0.44 vs $1.04/FPS
- Up to 58% better value in Atomfall
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-11700F vs Core i5-3450S: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-11700F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
226 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
169 FPS
100%
Price, $
$235.99
36%
Value, $/FPS
$1.04/FPS
42%
Core i5-3450S
Apr 29th, 2012
Average FPS
192 FPS
85%
Min 1% FPS
144 FPS
85%
Price, $
$85
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-11700F vs Core i5-3450S in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-11700F vs Core i5-3450S in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-11700F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i5-3450S
Apr 29th, 2012
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
71%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-11700F Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-3450S Apr 29th, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| $298.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1155 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 2500 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
