In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i7-11700F is same performance as the Core i5-11600K. However, it's a worse value for money, as it's $37 more expensive!
Core i7-11700F
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Core i5-11600K
- Up to 16% cheaper – $199.00 vs $235.99
- Up to 16% cheaper
- Up to 16% better value in The Last of Us Part I – $0.91 vs $1.08/FPS
- Up to 16% better value in The Last of Us Part I
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i7-11700F vs Core i5-11600K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-11700F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
218 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
100%
Price, $
$235.99
84%
Value, $/FPS
$1.08/FPS
84%
Core i5-11600K
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
218 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
99%
Price, $
$199
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.91/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-11700F vs Core i5-11600K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-11700F vs Core i5-11600K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-11700F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
64%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i5-11600K
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
12 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-11700F Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-11600K Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| $298.00 | MSRP | $262.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1200 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 750 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
