In Control, the Core i7-11700F is slightly faster than the Core i3-4130. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-11700F
- Up to 2% faster in Control – 251 vs 247 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Control
- Is 7 years and 6 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 7 years and 6 months newer
Core i3-4130
- Consumes up to 17% less energy – 54 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 17% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Control FPS Calculator
Core i7-11700F vs Core i3-4130: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-4130
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
247 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
162 FPS
99%
Price, $
$41
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-11700F vs Core i3-4130 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-11700F vs Core i3-4130 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-11700F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i3-4130
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
19%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-11700F Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-4130 Sep 1st, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| $298.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1150 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 54 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4400 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
