In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i7-11700F is slightly slower than the Celeron G3900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-11700F
- Is 5 years and 6 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Sep 01, 2015
- Is 5 years and 6 months newer
Celeron G3900
- Up to 17% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 197 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 17% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 51 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 22% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i7-11700F vs Celeron G3900: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Celeron G3900
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
197 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
147 FPS
100%
Price, $
$44.04
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.22/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-11700F vs Celeron G3900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-11700F vs Celeron G3900 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-11700F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Celeron G3900
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
4 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
67%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-11700F Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron G3900 Sep 1st, 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| $298.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 51 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 510 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
