In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i7-11700F is slower than the Celeron B820. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-11700F
- Is 8 years and 8 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Jul 01, 2012
- Is 8 years and 8 months newer
Celeron B820
- Up to 28% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 216 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 28% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i7-11700F vs Celeron B820: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-11700F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
169 FPS
78%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
78%
Price, $
$235.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.39/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-11700F vs Celeron B820 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-11700F vs Celeron B820 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-11700F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Celeron B820
Jul 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
12%
Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
68%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-11700F Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron B820 Jul 1st, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Jul 1st, 2012 |
| $298.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGAG2 (988B) |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
