The Core i7-11700 is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Pentium G640, however, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $253.26 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i7-11700
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of the Pentium G640
- Up to 90% cheaper – $26.73 vs $279.99
- A much better value for money for gaming
Core i7-11700 vs Pentium G640 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-11700
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
201
100%
Min 1% FPS
133
100%
Price, $
$279.99
9%
Value, $/FPS
$1.39/FPS
12%
Pentium G640
Jun 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
167
83%
Min 1% FPS
112
84%
Price, $
$26.73
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
100%
Core i7-11700 vs Pentium G640 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-11700 vs Pentium G640 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-11700 vs Pentium G640 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-11700
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Pentium G640
Jun 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
19%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-11700 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Pentium G640 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 3rd, 2012 |
| $323.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
| Rocket Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
16 MB | L3 Cache | 3 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
