In Atomfall, the Core i7-10870H is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 9 275HX. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-10870H
- Consumes up to 18% less energy – 45 vs 55 Watts
- Consumes up to 18% less energy
Core Ultra 9 275HX
- Up to 15% faster in Atomfall – 246 vs 213 FPS
- Up to 15% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 years and 3 months newer – Jan 13, 2025 vs Sep 17, 2020
- Is 4 years and 3 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-10870H vs Core Ultra 9 275HX: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 9 275HX
Jan 13th, 2025
Average FPS
246 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-10870H vs Core Ultra 9 275HX in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-10870H vs Core Ultra 9 275HX in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-10870H
Sep 17th, 2020
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
16 MB
44%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
93%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
46%
Core Ultra 9 275HX
Jan 13th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-10870H Sep 17th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 275HX Jan 13th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 17th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 13th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Laptop |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel BGA 2114 |
45W | Power Consumption | 55W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| UHD Graphics | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
