Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700KF and the cheaper Core i3-10100 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 6% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-10100 - 595 vs 561 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10100 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i3-10100
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i7-10700KF - $91.99 vs $225.95
- Up to 58% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-10700KF - $0.16 vs $0.38 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
595
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
42%
Price, $
$225.95
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for $225.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
561
94%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
100%
Price, $
$91.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $91.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-10700KF | vs | Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |