Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-13700F is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700K.
Advantages of Core i7-10700K
- Up to 8% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - $247.01 vs $269.79
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 13% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i7-10700K - 133 vs 118 FPS
- Up to 3% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i7-10700K - $2.03 vs $2.09 per FPS
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $247.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
133
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.03/FPS
100%
Price, $
$269.79
91%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $269.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-10700K | vs | Core i7-13700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |