In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i7-10700F is slightly slower than the Xeon W3565. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-10700F
- Is 10 years and 5 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Nov 01, 2009
- Is 10 years and 5 months newer
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Xeon W3565
- Up to 14% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 196 vs 172 FPS
- Up to 14% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i7-10700F vs Xeon W3565: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
172 FPS
88%
Min 1% FPS
129 FPS
88%
Price, $
$329.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.91/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-10700F vs Xeon W3565 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-10700F vs Xeon W3565 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Xeon W3565
Nov 1st, 2009
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
72%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-10700F Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon W3565 Nov 1st, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Nov 1st, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1366 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
