Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Core i7-10700F
- Up to 70% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $224.00 vs $740.00
- Up to 66% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $1.81 vs $5.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 65 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 12% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-10700F - 139 vs 124 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
124
89%
Value, $/FPS
$1.81/FPS
100%
Price, $
$224
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $224 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 262 minutes ago
Buy for $740 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 261 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-10700F | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |