In Atomfall, the Core i7-10700F is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 7 265F and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $42 more expensive!
Core i7-10700F
No clear advantages
Core Ultra 7 265F
- Up to 13% faster in Atomfall – 245 vs 217 FPS
- Up to 13% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 years and 8 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 4 years and 8 months newer
- Up to 13% cheaper – $288.00 vs $329.95
- Up to 13% cheaper
- Up to 23% better value in Atomfall – $1.17 vs $1.52/FPS
- Up to 23% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-10700F vs Core Ultra 7 265F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
217 FPS
89%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
89%
Price, $
$329.95
87%
Value, $/FPS
$1.52/FPS
77%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$288
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.17/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-10700F vs Core Ultra 7 265F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-10700F vs Core Ultra 7 265F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
40%
L3 Cache
16 MB
53%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
91%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
46%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-10700F Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265F Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
