In Atomfall, the Core i7-10700F is slightly slower than the Core i9-14900KF. However, it's a slightly better value for money, as it's $100 cheaper!
Core i7-10700F
- Up to 23% cheaper – $329.95 vs $429.99
- Up to 23% cheaper
- Up to 12% better value in Atomfall – $1.52 vs $1.73/FPS
- Up to 12% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Core i9-14900KF
- Up to 14% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 217 FPS
- Up to 14% faster in Atomfall
- Is 3 years and 5 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 3 years and 5 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-10700F vs Core i9-14900KF: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
217 FPS
88%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
88%
Price, $
$329.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.52/FPS
100%
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$429.99
76%
Value, $/FPS
$1.73/FPS
88%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-10700F vs Core i9-14900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-10700F vs Core i9-14900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
16 MB
44%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
80%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
52%
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-10700F Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900KF Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $564.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1700 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
