In Rust, the Core i7-10700F is slightly slower than the Core i9-14900F. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $146 cheaper!
Core i7-10700F
- Up to 31% cheaper – $329.95 vs $476.00
- Up to 31% cheaper
- Up to 18% better value in Rust – $1.40 vs $1.71/FPS
- Up to 18% better value in Rust
Core i9-14900F
- Up to 18% faster in Rust – 278 vs 235 FPS
- Up to 18% faster in Rust
- Is 3 years and 8 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 3 years and 8 months newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i7-10700F vs Core i9-14900F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
235 FPS
85%
Min 1% FPS
61 FPS
68%
Price, $
$329.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.4/FPS
100%
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
278 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
90 FPS
100%
Price, $
$476
69%
Value, $/FPS
$1.71/FPS
82%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-10700F vs Core i9-14900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-10700F vs Core i9-14900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
16 MB
44%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
83%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
52%
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-10700F Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $524.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
