In F1 23, the Core i7-10700F is faster than the Core i7-980X. However, it's a slightly worse value for money, as it's $55 more expensive!
Core i7-10700F
- Up to 17% faster in F1 23 – 262 vs 224 FPS
- Up to 17% faster in F1 23
- Is 10 years and 1 month newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 10 years and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Core i7-980X
- Up to 22% cheaper – $189.95 vs $245.00
- Up to 22% cheaper
- Up to 10% better value in F1 23 – $0.84 vs $0.93/FPS
- Up to 10% better value in F1 23
F1 23 FPS Calculator
Core i7-10700F vs Core i7-980X: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
262 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
100%
Price, $
$245
77%
Value, $/FPS
$0.93/FPS
90%
Core i7-980X
Mar 16th, 2010
Average FPS
224 FPS
85%
Min 1% FPS
135 FPS
81%
Price, $
$189.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.84/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-10700F vs Core i7-980X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-10700F vs Core i7-980X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
87%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Core i7-980X
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
12 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.333 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
75%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-10700F Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-980X Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1366 |
65W | Power Consumption | 130W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
