In Atomfall, the Core i7-10700F is faster than the Core i7-930 and it's also a slightly better value for money, as it's only $23 more expensive!
Core i7-10700F
- Up to 16% faster in Atomfall – 217 vs 187 FPS
- Up to 16% faster in Atomfall
- Is 10 years and 2 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Feb 28, 2010
- Is 10 years and 2 months newer
- Up to 7% better value in Atomfall – $1.52 vs $1.64/FPS
- Up to 7% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Core i7-930
- Up to 7% cheaper – $307.29 vs $329.95
- Up to 7% cheaper
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-10700F vs Core i7-930: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
217 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
100%
Price, $
$329.95
93%
Value, $/FPS
$1.52/FPS
100%
Core i7-930
Feb 28th, 2010
Average FPS
187 FPS
86%
Min 1% FPS
140 FPS
86%
Price, $
$307.29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.64/FPS
93%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-10700F vs Core i7-930 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-10700F vs Core i7-930 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Core i7-930
Feb 28th, 2010
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
3.066 GHz
64%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-10700F Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-930 Feb 28th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Feb 28th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1366 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
