In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i7-10700F is slower than the Core i7-820QM. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-10700F
- Is 10 years and 7 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Sep 23, 2009
- Is 10 years and 7 months newer
Core i7-820QM
- Up to 22% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 210 vs 172 FPS
- Up to 22% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 45 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i7-10700F vs Core i7-820QM: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
172 FPS
82%
Min 1% FPS
129 FPS
82%
Price, $
$329.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.91/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-10700F vs Core i7-820QM in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-10700F vs Core i7-820QM in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Core i7-820QM
Sep 23rd, 2009
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
1.733 GHz
60%
Turbo Frequency
3.067 GHz
64%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
45%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-10700F Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-820QM Sep 23rd, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Sep 23rd, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | $546.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 45 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | None |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
