In Dead Space, the Core i7-10700F is slightly faster than the Core i5-4670T. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-10700F
- Up to 1% faster in Dead Space – 177 vs 175 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Dead Space
- Is 6 years and 10 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jun 02, 2013
- Is 6 years and 10 months newer
Core i5-4670T
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 45 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Dead Space FPS Calculator
Core i7-10700F vs Core i5-4670T: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
177 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
93 FPS
100%
Price, $
$329.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.86/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-10700F vs Core i5-4670T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-10700F vs Core i5-4670T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Core i5-4670T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
69%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-10700F Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-4670T Jun 2nd, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1150 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 45 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4600 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
