The Core i7-10700F is the comparison's loser – it's a much slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-13100F and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $129.47 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i7-10700F
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of the Core i3-13100F
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 59% cheaper – $90.53 vs $220.00
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 11% less energy – 58 vs 65 Watts
Core i7-10700F vs Core i3-13100F
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
207
93%
Min 1% FPS
142
94%
Price, $
$220
41%
Value, $/FPS
$1.06/FPS
38%
Core i3-13100F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
222
100%
Min 1% FPS
151
100%
Price, $
$90.53
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-10700F vs Core i3-13100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-10700F vs Core i3-13100F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
85%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
61%
Core i3-13100F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
12 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
94%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-10700F | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-13100F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $109.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake-S |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 58 W |
| Performance | ||
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.4 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.5 GHz |
16 MB | L3 Cache | 12 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2933 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 4800 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | No |
