In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i7-10700 is slightly slower than the Core i7-6950X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-10700
- Is 3 years and 10 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs May 31, 2016
- Is 3 years and 10 months newer
- Consumes up to 54% less energy – 65 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 54% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-6950X
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 224 vs 222 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part I
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i7-10700 vs Core i7-6950X: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-10700
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
222 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
99%
Price, $
$299
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.34/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-10700 vs Core i7-6950X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-10700 vs Core i7-6950X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-10700
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
80%
L3 Cache
16 MB
64%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Core i7-6950X
May 31st, 2016
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
73%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
82%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-10700 Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-6950X May 31st, 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
| – | MSRP | $1,723.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA2011-3 |
65W | Power Consumption | 140W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
