In Atomfall, the Core i7-1068NG7 is slightly slower than the Core i9-13900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-1068NG7
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 28 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 57% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-13900F
- Up to 16% faster in Atomfall – 243 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 16% faster in Atomfall
- Is 3 years and 5 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Aug 01, 2019
- Is 3 years and 5 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-1068NG7 vs Core i9-13900F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
243 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
182 FPS
100%
Price, $
$529.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.18/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-1068NG7 vs Core i9-13900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-1068NG7 vs Core i9-13900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-1068NG7
Aug 1st, 2019
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
73%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
57%
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
87%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-1068NG7 Aug 1st, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 1st, 2019 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
$320.00 | MSRP | $524.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1344 | Socket | LGA1700 |
28 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
Iris Plus | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
