In Rust, the Core i7-1065G7 is slower than the Core Ultra 7 265F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-1065G7
- Consumes up to 77% less energy – 15 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 77% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core Ultra 7 265F
- Up to 23% faster in Rust – 278 vs 226 FPS
- Up to 23% faster in Rust
- Is 5 years and 5 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Aug 01, 2019
- Is 5 years and 5 months newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i7-1065G7 vs Core Ultra 7 265F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
278 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
90 FPS
100%
Price, $
$288
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.03/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-1065G7 vs Core Ultra 7 265F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-1065G7 vs Core Ultra 7 265F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-1065G7
Aug 1st, 2019
Cores
4-core
20%
L3 Cache
8 MB
27%
Base Frequency
1.3 GHz
54%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
74%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
50%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-1065G7 Aug 1st, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265F Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 1st, 2019 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $379.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1526 | Socket | LGA1851 |
15 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
Iris Plus | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
