In Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, the Core i7-1065G7 is slower than the Core i7-13700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-1065G7
- Consumes up to 77% less energy – 15 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 77% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-13700F
- Up to 25% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 – 126 vs 101 FPS
- Up to 25% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
- Is 3 years and 5 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Aug 01, 2019
- Is 3 years and 5 months newer
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 FPS Calculator
Core i7-1065G7 vs Core i7-13700F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-1065G7 vs Core i7-13700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-1065G7 vs Core i7-13700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-1065G7
Aug 1st, 2019
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
8 MB
27%
Base Frequency
1.3 GHz
62%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
75%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
57%
Core i7-13700F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-1065G7 Aug 1st, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-13700F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 1st, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $359.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1526 | Socket | LGA1700 |
15W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
Iris Plus | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
