In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i5-L16G7 is slightly slower than the Xeon X3440. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-L16G7
- Is 10 years and 9 months newer – Jun 15, 2020 vs Sep 08, 2009
- Is 10 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 93% less energy – 7 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 93% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon X3440
- Up to 3% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 201 vs 195 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i5-L16G7 vs Xeon X3440: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-L16G7 vs Xeon X3440 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-L16G7 vs Xeon X3440 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-L16G7
Jun 15th, 2020
Cores
5-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
1.4 GHz
55%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Max. LPDDR4X RAM Speed
4267 MHz
100%
Xeon X3440
Sep 8th, 2009
Cores
4-core
80%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.533 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
2.933 GHz
98%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
31%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-L16G7 Jun 15th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X3440 Sep 8th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 15th, 2020 | Released | Sep 8th, 2009 |
| $281.00 | MSRP | $215.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| Socket | LGA1156 | |
7 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 4267 MHz (LPDDR4X) | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
UHD Graphics 64EU | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
