In Rust, the Core i5-L16G7 is quite a bit slower than the Core Ultra 9 285K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-L16G7
- Consumes up to 94% less energy – 7 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 94% less energy
Core Ultra 9 285K
- Up to 37% faster in Rust – 288 vs 210 FPS
- Up to 37% faster in Rust
- Is 4 years and 4 months newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Jun 14, 2020
- Is 4 years and 4 months newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i5-L16G7 vs Core Ultra 9 285K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 9 285K
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
288 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
97 FPS
100%
Price, $
$505.16
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.75/FPS
100%
![Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Tetracosa-core [24 Core] 3.70 GHz Processor - OEM Pack - Box](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/cpus/B0DFKC99VL.jpg)
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-L16G7 vs Core Ultra 9 285K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-L16G7 vs Core Ultra 9 285K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-L16G7
Jun 14th, 2020
Cores
5-core
21%
L3 Cache
4 MB
11%
Base Frequency
1.4 GHz
38%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
53%
Max. LPDDR4X RAM Speed
4267 MHz
67%
Core Ultra 9 285K
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-L16G7 Jun 14th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 285K Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 14th, 2020 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
$281.00 | MSRP | $589.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Socket | LGA1851 | |
7 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 4267 MHz (LPDDR4X) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| UHD Graphics 64EU | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
