In Deathloop, the Core i5-L16G7 is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 9 285. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-L16G7
- Consumes up to 89% less energy – 7 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 89% less energy
Core Ultra 9 285
- Up to 11% faster in Deathloop – 245 vs 220 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Deathloop
- Is 4 years and 7 months newer – Jan 14, 2025 vs Jun 14, 2020
- Is 4 years and 7 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-L16G7 vs Core Ultra 9 285: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 14th, 2025
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
183 FPS
100%
Price, $
$563.41
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.29/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-L16G7 vs Core Ultra 9 285 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-L16G7 vs Core Ultra 9 285 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-L16G7
Jun 14th, 2020
Cores
5-core
21%
L3 Cache
4 MB
11%
Base Frequency
1.4 GHz
56%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
54%
Max. LPDDR4X RAM Speed
4267 MHz
67%
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 14th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-L16G7 Jun 14th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 285 Jan 14th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 14th, 2020 | Released | Jan 14th, 2025 |
$281.00 | MSRP | $579.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Socket | LGA1851 | |
7 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 4267 MHz (LPDDR4X) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| UHD Graphics 64EU | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
