In Deathloop, the Core i5-L16G7 is slightly slower than the Core i9-14900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-L16G7
- Consumes up to 94% less energy – 7 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 94% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-14900KF
- Up to 11% faster in Deathloop – 244 vs 220 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Deathloop
- Is 3 years and 4 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Jun 14, 2020
- Is 3 years and 4 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-L16G7 vs Core i9-14900KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
244 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
183 FPS
100%
Price, $
$429.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.76/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-L16G7 vs Core i9-14900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-L16G7 vs Core i9-14900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-L16G7
Jun 14th, 2020
Cores
5-core
21%
L3 Cache
4 MB
11%
Base Frequency
1.4 GHz
44%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
50%
Max. LPDDR4X RAM Speed
4267 MHz
76%
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-L16G7 Jun 14th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900KF Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 14th, 2020 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
$281.00 | MSRP | $564.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Socket | LGA1700 | |
7 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 4267 MHz (LPDDR4X) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD Graphics 64EU | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
