In Atomfall, the Core i5-L16G7 is slower than the Core i9-14900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-L16G7
- Consumes up to 89% less energy – 7 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 89% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-14900F
- Up to 29% faster in Atomfall – 245 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 29% faster in Atomfall
- Is 3 years and 6 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Jun 15, 2020
- Is 3 years and 6 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-L16G7 vs Core i9-14900F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$559.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.28/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-L16G7 vs Core i9-14900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-L16G7 vs Core i9-14900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-L16G7
Jun 15th, 2020
Cores
5-core
21%
L3 Cache
4 MB
11%
Base Frequency
1.4 GHz
70%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
52%
Max. LPDDR4X RAM Speed
4267 MHz
76%
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-L16G7 Jun 15th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 15th, 2020 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
$281.00 | MSRP | $524.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Socket | LGA1700 | |
7 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 4267 MHz (LPDDR4X) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD Graphics 64EU | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
