In Atomfall, the Core i5-L16G7 is slower than the Core i9-13900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-L16G7
- Consumes up to 94% less energy – 7 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 94% less energy
Core i9-13900K
- Up to 29% faster in Atomfall – 246 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 29% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 years and 3 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Jun 15, 2020
- Is 2 years and 3 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-L16G7 vs Core i9-13900K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
246 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
185 FPS
100%
Price, $
$548.89
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.23/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-L16G7 vs Core i9-13900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-L16G7 vs Core i9-13900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-L16G7
Jun 15th, 2020
Cores
5-core
21%
L3 Cache
4 MB
11%
Base Frequency
1.4 GHz
47%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
52%
Max. LPDDR4X RAM Speed
4267 MHz
76%
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-L16G7 Jun 15th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900K Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 15th, 2020 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
$281.00 | MSRP | $589.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Socket | LGA1700 | |
7 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 4267 MHz (LPDDR4X) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| UHD Graphics 64EU | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
