In Deathloop, the Core i5-L16G7 is slightly slower than the Core i9-12900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-L16G7
- Consumes up to 94% less energy – 7 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 94% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-12900KF
- Up to 7% faster in Deathloop – 236 vs 220 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in Deathloop
- Is 1 year and 4 months newer – Nov 04, 2021 vs Jun 15, 2020
- Is 1 year and 4 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-L16G7 vs Core i9-12900KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
![Intel Core i9 [12th Gen] i9-12900KF Hexadeca-core [16 Core] 3.20 GHz Processor - OEM Pack](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/cpus/B09LMQ7XGX.jpg)
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-L16G7 vs Core i9-12900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-L16G7 vs Core i9-12900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-L16G7
Jun 15th, 2020
Cores
5-core
31%
L3 Cache
4 MB
13%
Base Frequency
1.4 GHz
44%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
58%
Max. LPDDR4X RAM Speed
4267 MHz
89%
Core i9-12900KF
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-L16G7 Jun 15th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-12900KF Nov 4th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 15th, 2020 | Released | Nov 4th, 2021 |
$281.00 | MSRP | $564.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Socket | LGA1700 | |
7 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 4267 MHz (LPDDR4X) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD Graphics 64EU | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
