In Atomfall, the Core i5-L16G7 is slightly slower than the Core i7-9700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-L16G7
- Is 1 year and 1 month newer – Jun 16, 2020 vs Apr 23, 2019
- Is 1 year and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 89% less energy – 7 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 89% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-9700F
- Up to 14% faster in Atomfall – 215 vs 189 FPS
- Up to 14% faster in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-L16G7 vs Core i7-9700F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
215 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
161 FPS
100%
Price, $
$246.81
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.14/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-L16G7 vs Core i7-9700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-L16G7 vs Core i7-9700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-L16G7
Jun 16th, 2020
Cores
5-core
62%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
1.4 GHz
47%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
64%
Max. LPDDR4X RAM Speed
4267 MHz
100%
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
62%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-L16G7 Jun 16th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-9700F Apr 23rd, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 16th, 2020 | Released | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
$281.00 | MSRP | $333.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Socket | LGA1151 | |
7 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 4267 MHz (LPDDR4X) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 64EU | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
