In Atomfall, the Core i5-L16G7 is slightly faster than the Core i7-930. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-L16G7
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall – 189 vs 186 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall
- Is 10 years and 3 months newer – Jun 18, 2020 vs Feb 28, 2010
- Is 10 years and 3 months newer
- Consumes up to 95% less energy – 7 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 95% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-930
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-L16G7 vs Core i7-930: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-930
Feb 28th, 2010
Average FPS
186 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
140 FPS
99%
Price, $
$215
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.15/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-L16G7 vs Core i7-930 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-L16G7 vs Core i7-930 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-L16G7
Jun 18th, 2020
Cores
5-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
1.4 GHz
50%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
98%
Max. LPDDR4X RAM Speed
4267 MHz
100%
Core i7-930
Feb 28th, 2010
Cores
4-core
80%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.066 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-L16G7 Jun 18th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-930 Feb 28th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 18th, 2020 | Released | Feb 28th, 2010 |
| $281.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Socket | LGA1366 | |
7 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 4267 MHz (LPDDR4X) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 64EU | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
