In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i5-L16G7 is slightly faster than the Core i5-9400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-L16G7
- Up to 12% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 196 vs 175 FPS
- Up to 12% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Is 1 year and 5 months newer – Jun 14, 2020 vs Jan 08, 2019
- Is 1 year and 5 months newer
- Consumes up to 89% less energy – 7 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 89% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-9400F
No clear advantages
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i5-L16G7 vs Core i5-9400F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
175 FPS
89%
Min 1% FPS
131 FPS
89%
Price, $
$119.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-L16G7 vs Core i5-9400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-L16G7 vs Core i5-9400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-L16G7
Jun 14th, 2020
Cores
5-core
83%
L3 Cache
4 MB
44%
Base Frequency
1.4 GHz
48%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
73%
Max. LPDDR4X RAM Speed
4267 MHz
100%
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
62%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-L16G7 Jun 14th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9400F Jan 8th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 14th, 2020 | Released | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| $281.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Socket | LGA1151 | |
7 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 4267 MHz (LPDDR4X) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 64EU | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
