In Control, the Core i5-L16G7 is slightly slower than the Core i5-13400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-L16G7
- Consumes up to 89% less energy – 7 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 89% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-13400F
- Up to 2% faster in Control – 252 vs 246 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Control
- Is 2 years and 6 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Jun 14, 2020
- Is 2 years and 6 months newer
Control FPS Calculator
Core i5-L16G7 vs Core i5-13400F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-L16G7 vs Core i5-13400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-L16G7 vs Core i5-13400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-L16G7
Jun 14th, 2020
Cores
5-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
20%
Base Frequency
1.4 GHz
56%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
65%
Max. LPDDR4X RAM Speed
4267 MHz
89%
Core i5-13400F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-L16G7 Jun 14th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-13400F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 14th, 2020 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| $281.00 | MSRP | $196.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Socket | LGA1700 | |
7 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 4267 MHz (LPDDR4X) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD Graphics 64EU | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
