In Elden Ring, the Core i5-L16G7 is slightly slower than the Core i5-12400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-L16G7
- Consumes up to 89% less energy – 7 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 89% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-12400F
- Up to 1% faster in Elden Ring – 140 vs 139 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Elden Ring
- Is 1 year and 6 months newer – Jan 04, 2022 vs Jun 27, 2020
- Is 1 year and 6 months newer
Elden Ring FPS Calculator
Core i5-L16G7 vs Core i5-12400F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-12400F
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
140 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
105 FPS
100%
Price, $
$159.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.14/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-L16G7 vs Core i5-12400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-L16G7 vs Core i5-12400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-L16G7
Jun 27th, 2020
Cores
5-core
83%
L3 Cache
4 MB
22%
Base Frequency
1.4 GHz
56%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
68%
Max. LPDDR4X RAM Speed
4267 MHz
89%
Core i5-12400F
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
18 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-L16G7 Jun 27th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-12400F Jan 4th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 27th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| $281.00 | MSRP | $174.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Socket | LGA1700 | |
7W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 4267 MHz (LPDDR4X) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD Graphics 64EU | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
