In The Callisto Protocol, the Core i5-L16G7 is slightly faster than the Core i3-330M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-L16G7
- Up to 4% faster in The Callisto Protocol – 106 vs 102 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in The Callisto Protocol
- Is 10 years and 5 months newer – Jun 15, 2020 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 10 years and 5 months newer
- Consumes up to 80% less energy – 7 vs 35 Watts
- Consumes up to 80% less energy
Core i3-330M
No clear advantages
The Callisto Protocol FPS Calculator
Core i5-L16G7 vs Core i3-330M: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
102 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
70 FPS
95%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.97/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-L16G7 vs Core i3-330M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-L16G7 vs Core i3-330M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-L16G7
Jun 15th, 2020
Cores
5-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.4 GHz
66%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Max. LPDDR4X RAM Speed
4267 MHz
100%
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
40%
L3 Cache
3 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
25%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-L16G7 Jun 15th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 15th, 2020 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| $281.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Laptop |
| Socket | LGAG1 | |
7 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 4267 MHz (LPDDR4X) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| UHD Graphics 64EU | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
