In Deathloop, the Core i5-9600KF is slightly faster than the Xeon W3670. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-9600KF
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 221 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
- Is 8 years and 4 months newer – Jan 08, 2019 vs Aug 29, 2010
- Is 8 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 27% less energy – 95 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 27% less energy
Xeon W3670
No clear advantages
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-9600KF vs Xeon W3670: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-9600KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
221 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
165 FPS
100%
Price, $
$219.88
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.99/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-9600KF vs Xeon W3670 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-9600KF vs Xeon W3670 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-9600KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Xeon W3670
Aug 29th, 2010
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
75%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-9600KF Jan 8th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon W3670 Aug 29th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 8th, 2019 | Released | Aug 29th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1366 |
95 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
