In Rust, the Core i5-9600KF is slower than the Core Ultra 9 275HX. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-9600KF
No clear advantages
Core Ultra 9 275HX
- Up to 21% faster in Rust – 280 vs 231 FPS
- Up to 21% faster in Rust
- Is 6 years and 5 days newer – Jan 13, 2025 vs Jan 08, 2019
- Is 6 years and 5 days newer
- Consumes up to 42% less energy – 55 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 42% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i5-9600KF vs Core Ultra 9 275HX: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-9600KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
231 FPS
82%
Min 1% FPS
58 FPS
64%
Price, $
$219.88
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.95/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 9 275HX
Jan 13th, 2025
Average FPS
280 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
91 FPS
100%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-9600KF vs Core Ultra 9 275HX in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-9600KF vs Core Ultra 9 275HX in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-9600KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
9 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
85%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
42%
Core Ultra 9 275HX
Jan 13th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
73%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-9600KF Jan 8th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 275HX Jan 13th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 8th, 2019 | Released | Jan 13th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | Intel BGA 2114 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 55 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
