In Atomfall, the Core i5-9600KF is slightly slower than the Core i9-10900F. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $200 cheaper!
Core i5-9600KF
- Up to 48% cheaper – $219.88 vs $420.20
- Up to 48% cheaper
- Up to 47% better value in Atomfall – $1.02 vs $1.91/FPS
- Up to 47% better value in Atomfall
Core i9-10900F
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall – 219 vs 214 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall
- Is 1 year and 3 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jan 08, 2019
- Is 1 year and 3 months newer
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-9600KF vs Core i9-10900F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-9600KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
214 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
98%
Price, $
$219.88
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.02/FPS
100%
Core i9-10900F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
219 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
100%
Price, $
$420.2
52%
Value, $/FPS
$1.91/FPS
53%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-9600KF vs Core i9-10900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-9600KF vs Core i9-10900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-9600KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
60%
L3 Cache
9 MB
45%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
88%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
91%
Core i9-10900F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-9600KF Jan 8th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 8th, 2019 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | $464.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
