In Atomfall, the Core i5-9600KF is slightly faster than the Core i7-6850K. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $135 more expensive!
Core i5-9600KF
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall – 214 vs 207 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 years and 7 months newer – Jan 08, 2019 vs May 31, 2016
- Is 2 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 95 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Core i7-6850K
- Up to 61% cheaper – $85.00 vs $219.88
- Up to 61% cheaper
- Up to 60% better value in Atomfall – $0.41 vs $1.02/FPS
- Up to 60% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-9600KF vs Core i7-6850K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-9600KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
214 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
100%
Price, $
$219.88
38%
Value, $/FPS
$1.02/FPS
40%
Core i7-6850K
May 31st, 2016
Average FPS
207 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
155 FPS
97%
Price, $
$85
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-9600KF vs Core i7-6850K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-9600KF vs Core i7-6850K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-9600KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
60%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i7-6850K
May 31st, 2016
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
15 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
83%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
90%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-9600KF Jan 8th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-6850K May 31st, 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 8th, 2019 | Released | May 31st, 2016 |
| – | MSRP | $617.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA2011-3 |
95 W | Power Consumption | 140 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
